4 years ago

Important information is frequently deleted from YouTube... therefore, I am putting a extra copy here... just in case. You can find the original at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWNkJUDctdk&t=367s

Dr. Sam Bailey of New Zealand discusses the PCR tests - at about the 5:40 mark she reveals how NOT a single country has been able to isolate a purified sample of Covid-19... so what are they testing for and what are the vaccines targeting?

- At 40 cycle thresholds, the PCR creates 1 trillion copies of a portion of a single strand

- does create a certain number of mismatch errors; the more cycles, the higher number of errors; the strands are separated during each cycle; rebuilt using a tiny sequence, then all are separated again during the next cycle - doubling the number of strands. As the strands are doubled, so are any errors created along the way

- PCR test only detects a small sequence of genetic material; it does not detect anything close to the entire genome of the organism; this small sequence could exist in other genetic material not related to what is being searched for

- PCR tests cannot tell the difference between living and dead genetic material

- Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR: "... doesn't tell you that you are sick. These tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all."

- No double-blind study has ever been conducted to determine if the PCR test can reliably diagnose any disease.

- Manufacturers of PCR tests typically have disclaimers that they are not suitable for diagnositic purposes and are non-specific.

- Qualitative PCR - traditional technique designed to determine if a particular DNA "FRAGMENT" is present or not.

- Quantitative PCR (qPCR) - used to determine how much of the DNA "FRAGMENT" is present.

- Product descriptions are misleading in that they attempt to correlate qPCR - meaning quantity equals qualitative detection (whether the fragment is present or not)

- Fauci and other international health agencies fail to push for the release of the number of cycle thresholds used in PCR tests to determine a 'positive' test. The more cycles needed to reach the 'positive' level means the actual number of virus fragments in the sample is quite low. Anything over 30 - 35 cycles needed to reach a 'positive' test result is highly suspect, especially considering the 'test' cannot distinguish between living and dead fragments.

- Before any RNA can be 'tested' in a PCR, it must be converted to complimentry DNA. In the course of the conversion process the amount of DNA obtained with the same RNA base material can vary widely, even as much as by a factor of 10. This can cause great variation in the outcome of the 'test'.

- European courts have declared the PCR 'tests' not fit for purpose - lawsuits are underway where they have been pushed to determine lock downs, mask mandates and vaccines.

References:
1. History of PCR - https://tinyurl.com/yy8ucboe and https://www.thesciencenotes.com/history-of-pcr/

2. PCR overview - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction

3. PCR animation video - DNA Learning Center: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KoLnIwoZKU&t=0s

4. The Significance of Responses of the Genome to Challenge - Barbara McClintock 1983: https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/mcclintock-lecture.pdf

5. Ronaldo on PCR tests: https://ronaldo.com/football-news/pcr-positive-is-bullshit-ronaldo-outraged-at-third-positive-test/

6. The MIQE guidelines: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19246619/

7. NZ Taxpayers’ Union - $222,000 in taxpayer funds to left-wing opinion pieces: https://us7.campaign-archive.com/?u=c86359d14575615d6ae8c2b60&id=c072a23de5

8. Siouxsie Wiles thinks Covid PCR tests are great: https://thespinoff.co.nz/science/21-09-2020/how-the-pcr-test-works-and-why-its-such-a-critical-weapon-against-covid-19/

9. PCR test kit - not for diagnostic https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/pdf/CD019RT.pdf

10. Corman-Drosten SARS-CoV-2 PCR paper: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045

11. The International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) reviewed the Corman-Drosten Paper and in November 2020 submitted the review to Eurosurveillance, listing numerous serious flaws, the significance of which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19. These flaws led to a possible 97% chance of a false positives and the flaws were used by policymakers to determine closures, lock downs of every aspect, including education, forced testing and to push unnecessary vaccines. The ICSLS also submitted a letter requesting the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted. https://cormandrostenreview.com/

12. PCR specificity - control sample lab test, not clinical specificity: https://web.archive.org/web/20201022131151/https://www.finddx.org/covid-19/sarscov2-eval-molecular/molecular-eval-results/

13. RT - Legal ruling finds Covid test not fit for purpose: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/

14. Principia Scientifica - WHO finally admits PCR test has a problem: https://principia-scientific.com/who-finally-admits-covid19-pcr-test-has-a-problem/

15. Sir Frank Macfarlane Burnet - Genes Dreams and Realities, 1971: https://www.amazon.com/Genes-Dreams-Realities-Burnet-MacFarlane/dp/9401171343/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid&sr

Loading comments...