The Rittenhouse Trial: A Case Study on Self-Defense Rights, Prosecutorial Abuse and Media Misconduct

Kyle Rittenhouse was found "not guilty" by a guilty after a controversial murder trial for defending himself against attackers at a riot in Kenosha. While this is a victory for one's right to defend oneself, there are also questions of prosecutorial misconduct and hefty media bias by those who covered the court proceedings.
Our panel from the London Center for Policy Research discusses the importance of the Rittenhouse trial beyond the verdict as we delve into the underlying issues:
The right to self-defense
Minimum Standard Response
2nd Amendment Suffrage
Prosecutorial Misconduct/Abuse of power
Blatant media bias during coverage of the trial

Our panelists:
LTC (Ret) Tony Shaffer - LCPR President
LTC (British Army, Ret) Tim Wilson - LCPR Senior Fellow
Navy Capt (Ret) Pete O'Brien - LCPR Distinguished Fellow
Marine Capt. Bill Heinzelmann - LCPR Senior Fellow

Thank you for watching; please feel free to comment, share and subscribe.

Or, please feel free to make a contribution here: paypal.com/us/fundraiser/charity/1338653

Thought to Action is presented by the London Center for Policy Research https://www.londoncenter.org​