Slow Is Smooth and Smooth Is Fast

ONCE UPON A DECEMBER: VIRTUE TESTING

General George Washington spent his first winter trying to get to Jersey, had lost every battle, had an army with an enlistment contract expiring who had lost hope and were planning to just say goodbye to General George. However, the losing General Washington did not know two things, and one of the things he did not know is still unknown today: one of his closest confidantes was a British spy, which may explain why he kept losing.

But General Washington lucked out. The British Spy did his job to tell the enemy. Washington even had British loyalists who crossed the river with him and ran ahead to Trenton, deserting the Continental Army assault force on Trenton to warn the Hessians. However, the Hessians had a commander who did not see George as a credible threat.

Washington had a plan, weather delayed him by three hours, he did not know one of his closest friends was a spy, and did not know he had loyalists in his invasion force running ahead to alert his enemies, and George received the worst news in the world: the two other commanders he thought were going to cross the river at separate points to help out, couldn't make it, and George was all alone, but George decided to forge ahead anyway, but the leadership question, a nonessential answer for followers who just do what they are told, is if you knew what George knew, against the popular choice, forge on to become the hero of the Battle of Trenton? Or would you wait until things were optimal: the standard expressed by Captain Brett Crozier to flag officers before he essentially invaded Guam, violated the Third Amendment, committed voluntary manslaughter and scuttled the Pacific.

In a former life as a top army spy, I personally knew the person over all intelligence oversight, the attorney who handled all of the legal problems that arose and the dude in charge of the polygraph program. And, besides being curious about how you might be able to cheat a polygraph, as a counterintelligence guy, the operative question was: if you beat the polygraph, could I still catch you in a lie, nonetheless. Short answer: yes.

Multiple people have said that the other person is playing politics in pandemic, and that is an easy sell, just like telling your momma it wasn't you, but your sibling. So, we designed an easy test, no science, with only one right or wrong answer. If you disagree with the analysis, you have an ulterior motive that has just been exposed.

We framed an inquiry to the White House in March, and then also told them exactly why we wanted the information, and they, in turn decided to refuse to respond.

So, we went to court, where the only thing the court has to figure out is whether or not the White House responded to a FOIA. Yes or no.

If not, did they provide a proper reason? Yes or no.

There are no other choices on this multiple-choice test. You have no way to defend the President for failing to respond, and if you support him in his nonresponse, you are a traitor to the United States. Any questions?