Flight Over Crowd Compilation - PROTEST MELBOURNE 28/11/21

#melbourne #protest #now #live #melbournedetectivemedia

Protest happening now in Melbourne

Compilation acknowledges various sources.

Scene 1; Helicopter photograhs and video shows Melbourne, Australia. However due to the angle of the helicopter the crowd size and length is obscured.

Scene 2; On ground surviellence is "within the crowd" and does not show the size of the crowd.

Scene 3; Vantage Point Corner of Bourke Street and Elizabeth Street; nice impact video showing the crowd converging within Bourke Street Mall. However, the videographer does not pan around and show all angles of the crowd.

Scene 4; Victoria by Drone - Is one of the best videos captured on the day and shows the length of part of the protest from Queen and Flinders Street to the Treasury Gardens, however it did not capture the line of protestors prior in Queen Street, or Bourke Street and the "clumping of protestors in Treasure Gardens is not visualized".

Scene 5; Surviellence pictures within the crowd in Bourke Street. Mainly showing signs, people at different points in time and or moving with a time and date stamp. It is the only evidence based videography that clearly shows the time, date.

Further, the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) allows people to use copyright material without the copyright
owner’s permission in certain situations, including fair dealing for specific purposes.

In the case of TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty Ltd (‘The Panel Case’), the
primary judge stated some principles in relation to "fair dealing":

• fair dealing involves questions of degree and impression;
• fair dealing is to be judged by the criterion of a fair minded and honest person; and
• fair dealing is an abstract concept.

In the case of Time Warner Entertainment Co Ltd v Channel 4 Television Corporation plc (1993) it was said that the question to be answered is whether the program incorporating the infringing
material is a genuine piece of criticism or review or an attempt to dress up the infringement
of another's copyright in the guise of criticism and so profit unfairly from another's work