Oral Argument - Audio SCOTUS COVID Case

Nat. Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Dept. of Labor. Date Argued: 01/07/22

Listening to this as a lawyer who has practiced in the SCOTUS, makes me very sad.
Besides the dozens of unrefuted, incorrect, ignorant, and irrelevant conclusory statistical statements spewed out by Kagan, Sotomayor, and Breyer (none of whom seem to know anything about COVID, and all of whom assume, incorrectly, a doomsday scenario), there was no mention of disparate impact to smaller corporations, the Constitution, Individual rights, or the "right to privacy" so precious to the far left Justices. It was as if I was listening to politicians. In fact, Sotomayor admitted it was all political toward the end when she said "well, if they don't like it, they can vote it down in the future" knowing full well this OSHA mandate was not voted on, not even given a period of comment, and knowing too that the proper route to this kind of unprecedented law is through the Legislature. Is The Judicial Branch married to the Executive Branch? Bingo. It's been happening for decades. Since the Civil War, actually.

Decision was weak - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a244_hgci.pdf

Full Argument, which included the medical workers in a separate case, arguing against mandatory vaccines. It's beyond me why any Judge would agree that any government official or business has the authority to force a worker to undergo a medical procedure.
THIS COURT, AND THOSE BEOFRE IT HAVE EMBRACED EUGENICS BEFORE. BE VERY AFRAID. The Nuremburg Code has been shredded.