Premium Only Content

Derivation of Doppler Equation for RADAR
This video shows how we get the Doppler Equation for RADAR to find the new wavelength, new frequency, or the speed of an object. Some animations are used to provide better intuition. Below is a basic script.
Let's consider how to tell what exactly these wavelength and frequency changes are
Let's look at the wavelength
So here is the propagation of a typical wave when the source is not moving
It's wavelength, lambda-not, is the distance it travels over one period
Now, let's say the source is moving, so that within the timeframe of this period, it moved up to this point
Now the wavelength is bunched in, so let's determine that new wavelength
It is the same as the old wavelength minus that distance it traveled
That distance it traveled is the velocity of the source times the period of time for the one oscillation we're considering
That period is simply one over the originial frequency, f_0, so let's replace that
And this is our equation for the new wavelength
We could also solve for the observed frequency, f, by subbing in here
Then taking the inverse of both sides, we can isolate the observed frequency by multiplying by c
Now this is a little tricky, but assuming the velocity is small compared to the speed of light, we can adjust this equation to make it easier as follows
And simplify with a 1 here.
So this would be the observed frequency given the source is traveling towards the observeer, which would be higher than the original frequency since we're adding, as expected
Consider though if were are looking at radar, we need to double this, because the radar wave goes to the object and back, so we get this effect twice
1 more thing to consider, and that is the angle.
We determined the equation for when the source is going straight towards the observer
But we allready noted this would have the opposite effect if the source was going away from the observer,
But also, what happens if the source is traveling perpendicular to the observer?
We can see that here that an observer on the top would observe the same frequency in either case. So there should be no 'Doppler shift' of the frequency for an observer here.
All we need to do to account for this is consider this angle, theta, and throw it into a cosine.
So checking this out,
if theta is 0, we do get larger f and lower wavelength
if theta is 90 degrees, that cosine term goes to 0, and we get no change.
If theta is 180 degrees, we get a negative value, corresponding to a smaller f and larger wavelength
So this checks out
Another way to consider this equation is if you always just consider theta as the angle between the objects velocity and the line between them, then you can consider this should be additive if they are going more toward each other, and negative if the velocity is taking the observer and source further away from each other.
And that is the basic intuition and a basic derivation of where we get the Radar Doppler Equation. Let me know if you have anything to add or any questions, and hopefully now you are properly inspired to dress up as the Doppler effect next Halloween.
Take care,
-
LIVE
LFA TV
14 hours agoLIVE & BREAKING NEWS! | FRIDAY 10/17/25
3,093 watching -
LIVE
Crypto Power Hour
2 hours agoCrypto Trading Strategies You Need to Know
79 watching -
LIVE
The Chris Salcedo Show
13 hours ago $3.57 earnedReckoning on Injustices Perpetrated Against Americans
538 watching -
1:33:18
Game On!
20 hours ago $1.02 earnedAnother Football Friday! BEST BETS For The Weekend!
20.4K -
21:44
DeVory Darkins
10 hours ago $6.10 earnedMamdani BODIES Cuomo in fatal debate as California gets exposed for homeless fraud scheme
16.1K57 -
14:23
Tactical Considerations
16 hours ago $7.26 earned5 Budget Pistols I would Actually Carry Under $425
31.4K2 -
15:24
ArynneWexler
19 hours ago"I'm the Mayor Now" Somalian Midwest Takeover | NN Clip
21.1K42 -
14:49
Esports Awards
20 hours agoEsports Awards 2025 Finalist Reveal
21K -
2:00:46
BEK TV
1 day agoTrent Loos in the Morning - 10/17/2025
17.1K -
53:31
Daniel Davis Deep Dive
17 hours agoU.S. War Dept v. Russia /Larry Johnson & Lt Col Daniel Davis
18.2K18