Bill Martin's 4-5-2003 talk, part 5 of 5 announcing publication of Sic Itur Ad Astra

In the long run, in a thousand years, it will make no difference whether you selected the trustees or not. In the long run, it will be up to competition anyhow, and the natural estates will be competitively operated, and the best ones will get the most money, on behalf of their clients who may not have know about this company and its selection.
Sic Itur Ad Astra V-201: Session 22, Part A, Vol. IV, pp. 63-4

The corporation that owns the Institute is intended for durability. Whether it attains durability or not, I cannot say, because that depends on the successorship and the ideologically compatible operation of it subsequent to my not running it.
Sic Itur Ad Astra V-201: Session 44, Part B, Vol. VII, p. 260

The selection of a natural estate trustee is a personal responsibility of the one who makes it. However, it doesn't really make any difference, because even with the best selection, even if you say this company is really slated to be a successful one, and it's intended for the species time scale and you think it's going to make it, you could be wrong. And you don't want your natural estate wiped out now, do you? Just because you selected a poor netco? So your will should provide that if certain minimum standards of handling your property are not fulfilled, the company automatically loses your account.
Sic Itur Ad Astra V-201: Session 22, Part A, Vol. IV, p. 63

Ladies and gentlemen, is it not obvious from the quotes above that Professor Galambos would consider the "trustees" squatting on his P1 and P2 to have lost his account?

See Spacelandpublications.com and The Zama Day Letter by Mr. Bill Cobb on this site for more information